Page 91 of 91

Re: Criminal Girls official info thread (read this first)

Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2015 7:14 pm
by Ultimate_Nova_X
If the burden of proof isn't on the act of censorship, then it means people are allowed to change things for the sake of changing things.

No.

Re: Criminal Girls official info thread (read this first)

Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2015 2:13 pm
by lopez
I guess we're both talking about two fundamentally different things. Let's move on since we keep getting off-topic (we can move this to my Hot Topic thread in General if you're interested, that's kinda why I created it, so people could have a specific outlet for all the controversial issues).

Re: Criminal Girls official info thread (read this first)

Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 2:41 am
by BDSMKane
lopez wrote:
Ultimate_Nova_X wrote:
Rednal wrote:I ain't going through 90 pages of angry discussions just to pull out a few relevant bits. Sorry. :lol:

And that's why I ain't requesting you to elaborate over PM like you offered. Given that it's likely you'll misrepresent and exaggerate the other views to make your position sound like the only reasonable one like you always did.


It's hard to stay objective when the prevailing arguments and general discussion have been heavily biased subjective views.

I have to wonder if this post was intentionally ironic, or just an oversight.

Re: Criminal Girls official info thread (read this first)

Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:22 am
by Ultimate_Nova_X
BDSMKane wrote:
lopez wrote:
Ultimate_Nova_X wrote:
Rednal wrote:I ain't going through 90 pages of angry discussions just to pull out a few relevant bits. Sorry. :lol:

And that's why I ain't requesting you to elaborate over PM like you offered. Given that it's likely you'll misrepresent and exaggerate the other views to make your position sound like the only reasonable one like you always did.


It's hard to stay objective when the prevailing arguments and general discussion have been heavily biased subjective views.

I have to wonder if this post was intentionally ironic, or just an oversight.

If this was intentionally ironic, then lopez is a terrible moderator. Since I'm charitable, I went with the latter.