



vampko wrote:Ar tonelico was jointly developed with Bandai, so Bandai held some of the rights for those games, so Gust had to make it a different series to be able to continue making it since they're with Tecmo Koei now. But, that's just deductive reasoning, and it's not necessarily the correct conclusion. It's just a hypothesis of mine really.

Mlada wrote:vampko wrote:Ar tonelico was jointly developed with Bandai, so Bandai held some of the rights for those games, so Gust had to make it a different series to be able to continue making it since they're with Tecmo Koei now. But, that's just deductive reasoning, and it's not necessarily the correct conclusion. It's just a hypothesis of mine really.
But I thought Gust was the sole developer for all of them with the exception of Qoga where it was with Banpresto. I gathered that publishers play no part in rights (which I thought was Bandai's only role, unless they own Banpresto, which I admit, I don't know anything about that so I am ignorant about that issue)? That said, Banpresto did develop Qoga, but just because of that, they don't own rights to the entire series, do they? I'm honestly asking this, not disputing anything. Because the theory of them wanting to use the world but having to tip-toe around copyrighted names would make sense too...



lordryo wrote:Well, there's some nice Ion fanart floating around the net, Ive stumbled across some myself and am kind enough to share with you.Spoiler:




vampko wrote:That's exactly how it works, even if they were just a publisher in that country. They would get some rights to the game for that country. considering Banpresto (yes, owned by Bandai) co-developed Qoga, yes, they most definitely cannot use that world unless they are able to buy the rights back.
So, this is most likely them tip-toeing around the copyright issues.





Users browsing this forum: SpaceDrake and 21 guests