Dr.Doom wrote:The visuals are good, but compared to a high end game they aren't the best looking visuals I've seen. Besides, it looks good enough, so what if it isn't high end, it doesn't(or shouldn't) take away from the enjoyment of the game.
Yea but just because it isn't high end doesn't mean the visuals should be dropped to like so slow.
They would give a Mario game that looks like it could be made for N64 and they would still give the graphics a 4/5 or a 8/10.
Look at what games like Plants vs. Zombies receive for graphics!http://ps3.ign.com/articles/114/1148286p1.html
an 8.0!!!! above average score for something so visually lower quality compared to HN mk2!
Look at the score Disgaea 4 visuals received! http://www.rpgamer.com/pointsofview/arc ... &game=2083
HOW IN THE WORLD could they give HN m2's visuals a LOWER SCORE (2/5) than Disgaea 4's visuals???
That's like saying Final Fantasy Tactics visuals are a level above Sonic Adventure.